I probably shouldn't say anything or the guy might come here but oh well...
I mean, just read this http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=230906 and you will know everything you need to know. (To be honest the first couple of pages is more than enough and more than that might not be good for your mental health) The first page already has a couple of (or at least , added below, as the others didn't work for me anymore) comparison screenshots and here's one quote:
"That said, be very careful with all releases from this company as
the egomaniac Krekel is completely resistant to all good suggestions
like leaving natural film grain intact. He amateurishly gets into verbal
infight on message boards (banned already on cinefacts.de) and writes
his own positive Amazon.de reviews.."
Left MGM right DigiDreams (I think this is Cyborg?)
Their Moontrap Blu looks fucking horrible. Doesn't look even close to DVD quality to me, but what do I know... And the worst thing is that other companies in the USA and UK were only allowed to use the DigiDreams master. Olive's Blu got 1/5 for video quality at Blu-Ray.com and I think the UK company only released a DVD and even that looks like shit.
If I had to choose between DigiDreams or nothing I would choose nothing.
As for Companeros.. I think the BU disc is just from another one of those shitty Italian masters and I honestly don't think DigiDreams would have anything better.
The Italian labs have supposedly replaced their shitty scanners some time ago but we still get some of the scans made in the old equipment. And now we have them messing with the colors so several Arrow releases already mention they have been color corrected by Arrow...