Another fave movie of mine I canāt skip to comment (boy am I not lazy tonight )
First time, I saw a part of this movie on TV, somewhere, 9 years ago, then had to go to an English class (I was 13 then I think), and I wished I would see the whole movie, since Coburn is my favorite actor (not hard to see by avatar, is it? ). I just adored the way he did the āFistful of dynamiteā, being a horse-smiling Irish revolutionary. Here, he was just so, differentā¦
What I never could understand, is, how can you put together 3 so different actors such as Bud Spencer, James Coburn and Telly Savalas, plus all of them to function in a bombastic movie? I mean, Bud Spencer will for me always be ābear-like low-IQ killing machineā, Telly Savalas a creepy villain and an excellent comedian in the same role (On Her Majestyās Secret Service;Dirty Dozen), letās just say he was creepy, and as for Coburnā¦ Hell, he was a universal actor. Unusual to be seen in serious roles as this one is, but I more like remember him as Britt from the āSevenā, Flint the secret agent, or in the worst case - both of those as Sean Mallory.
I mean, there you have a bear, a creep and a serious major. āThe serious, the creep and the bearā, sounds bad to me, that is what I thought when I looked up the movie on internet. Yet, I decided to give it a chance. Can it be bad?
I got a movie, from a friend, and watched it. Yeah, it did remind a bit of Dirty Dozen, yet it did not. I mean, I really like those āassembling a teamā westerns, such as Magnificent Seven orā¦ Well, Magnificent Seven. Many say it was a Dirty Dozen copycat. But is the Dirty Dozen 2: The Next Mission actually a copy of this movie? I mean, there you have some hanging runaways, them refusing to go onto a mission, the āthere is a load of gold if you go with meā trick, successful mission, everyone but main hero dyingā¦ Anyone noticed?
Anyways, I somehow loved how the plot was going on, and Bud Spencer really did amazing job. Itās Bud Spencer. Need I say more? Savallas was underused, I agree, but, should he have said more? I mean, we donāt like villains that speak much. That is why I liked Henry Fonda in Leoneās OUATITW, Lee Van Cleef in The Good, Bad and the Ugly etc.
The plot is original. Well, the motive is not, but plot sure is. I mean, unique idea - he forced a man to surrender a fort threatening with his sonās life. And killed him anyways. I mean, to me, it is much better than the Kinskiās Loco role in Silence. I mean, Locoās " I wonāt kill you" - then shot anyways, is nothing compared to this.
The shooting scenes are amazing, and how everyone in the end managed to get so dedicated to the missionā¦ And of courseā¦ Valerii gave us something not so usual, a true Corbucci-like ending: He does not spare Savallas. He stabs him with his own sword. Yeah, it might have been stupid if he would have not killed him, but I thought it would be a Companeros-like ending. The villain surrenders, turns around to shoot and gets killed.
Well, to sum up in the end (am writing too much ), I gave this movie a 5, since it is a rarity in its genre. Unlike the first impression I had, I changed my view of it - it is a great movie I recommend to anyone who likes this genre.