[quote=âDillinger, post:41, topic:2068â]So this discussion seems to be ended? Voting starts or what?!
Why do we suddenly have leading and supporting actors? IMO nonsense!
There are so many actors, who starred in both leading AND supporting roles.
So we would have to judge on certain roles in certain flicks and not on general efforts in the field of SW.
We should drop that distinction![/quote]
Voting starts. You may vote a person in both categories if you feel he belongs to both. I donât see that as a problem at all.
[quote=âDillinger, post:42, topic:2068â]Has a real hall of fame categories at all?
Why donât we each just pick 10 persons and the 10 with the most votes get into the hall.[/quote]
THere has to be categories. I realize because of cultural reasons you might not be familiar with the concept of what a hall of fame is supposed to be like. Just imagine if we had a football hall of fame with 10 of the best players of all time inducted in categories of midfielder, striker, fullback, goalkeeper, manager etcâŚand under modern, pioneer etcâŚThink of it that way.
That would make tallying more difficult but I appreciate your suggestion. On the actual hall of fame inductee we will list the inductees along with the categories in which they are inducted for underneath or beside their names.
I guess we can post our votes in this topic, although I was under the impression that voting should be confidential but eh it doenst matter.
to those who already voted so far, excellent job!
Oh and another point. If it says name 10 and you can only think of 9, thats okay. I shouldâve said âname up to 10â.
Feel free to send your votes anytime over the next month or so, no need to rush. This voting should be taken seriously so its okay to sleep on it. I think the deadline can be december 15th. Howâs that?