Roman Polanski Arrested


(autephex) #1

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/09/28/zurich.roman.polanski.arrested/index.html?eref=igoogle_cnn

French authorities expressed solidarity with Roman Polanski’s family Monday after authorities arrested the filmmaker on a 1970s sexual-offense charge involving a 13-year-old girl.

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said he hoped authorities would respect Polanski’s rights “and that the affair (will) come to a favorable resolution,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

The French culture and communications minister, Frederic Mitterrand, said he “learned with astonishment” of Polanski’s arrest. He expressed solidarity with Polanski’s family and said “he wants to remind everyone that Roman Polanski benefits from great general esteem” and has “exceptional artistic creation and human qualities.”

Investigators in the United States say Polanski drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl in the 1970s. Polanski pleaded guilty in 1977 to having unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, but he fled the United States before he could be sentenced and settled in France.

U.S. authorities have had a warrant for his arrest since 1978. Police in Switzerland arrested Polanski on that warrant Saturday after the 76-year-old tried to enter Switzerland to attend the Zurich Film Festival, which is holding a tribute to Polanski this year.

Mitterrand said he has spoken with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and that Sarkozy “shares his hope for a rapid resolution to the situation which would allow Roman Polanski to rejoin his family as quickly as possible.”

Mitterrand said he “greatly regrets that Mr. Polanski has had yet another difficulty added to an already turbulent existence.”

Polanski won an Academy Award for best director in 2003 for “The Pianist.” He was nominated for best director Oscars for “Tess” and “Chinatown” and for best writing for “Rosemary’s Baby,” which he also directed.

A spokesman for the Swiss Justice Ministry said Polanski was arrested upon arrival at the airport.

A provisional arrest warrant was issued last week out of Los Angeles, California, after authorities learned he was going to be in Switzerland, Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, told CNN on Sunday.

There have been repeated attempts to settle the case over the years, but the sticking point has always been Polanski’s refusal to return to attend hearings. Prosecutors have consistently argued that it would be a miscarriage of justice to allow a man to go free who “drugged and raped a 13-year-old child.”

The Swiss Justice Ministry said Polanski was put “in provisional detention.” But whether he can be extradited to the United States “can be established only after the extradition process judicially has been finalized,” ministry spokesman Guido Balmer said in an e-mail.

Gibbons said the extradition process will be determined in Switzerland, but said authorities are ready to move forward with Polanski’s sentencing process, depending on what happens in Zurich.

Polanski was accused of plying the then-teenage girl, Samantha Geimer, with champagne and a sliver of a Quaalude tablet and performing various sex acts, including intercourse, with her during a photo shoot at actor Jack Nicholson’s house. He was 43 at the time.

Nicholson was not at home, but his girlfriend at the time, actress Anjelica Huston, was there. According to a probation report contained in the filing, Huston described the teen as “sullen.”

“She appeared to be one of those kind of little chicks between – could be any age up to 25. She did not look like a 13-year-old scared little thing,” Huston said.

She said Polanski did not strike her as the type of man who would force himself on a young girl.

“I don’t think he’s a bad man,” she said in the report. “I think he’s an unhappy man.”

Polanski’s lawyers tried this year to have the charges thrown out, but a judge in Los Angeles rejected the request. However, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Peter Espinoza left the door open to reconsider his ruling if Polanski shows up in court.

Espinoza also appeared to acknowledge problems with the way the 76-year-old director’s case was handled years ago.

According to court documents, Polanski, his lawyer and the prosecutor thought they’d worked out a deal that would spare Polanski from prison and let the teen avoid a public trial.

But the original judge in the case, who is now dead, first sent the director to maximum-security prison for 42 days while he underwent psychological testing. Then, on the eve of his sentencing, the judge told attorneys he was inclined to send Polanski back to prison for another 48 days.

Polanski fled the United States for France, where he was born.

In the February 2009 hearing, Espinoza mentioned a documentary film, “Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired,” that depicts backroom deals between prosecutors and a media-obsessed judge who was worried his public image would suffer if he didn’t send Polanski to prison. The documentary was first broadcast in June 2008.

“It’s hard to contest some of the behavior in the documentary was misconduct,” Espinoza said. But he declined to dismiss the case entirely.

Geimer is among those calling for the case to be tossed out. She filed court papers in January saying, "I am no longer a 13-year-old child. I have dealt with the difficulties of being a victim, have surmounted and surpassed them with one exception.

“Every time this case is brought to the attention of the court, great focus is made of me, my family, my mother and others. That attention is not pleasant to experience and is not worth maintaining over some irrelevant legal nicety, the continuation of the case.”

Geimer, now 45, married and a mother of three, sued Polanski and received an undisclosed settlement. She long ago came forward and made her identity public – mainly, she said, because she was disturbed by how the criminal case had been handled.


(Dillinger) #2

Well, if Polanski really did, what he is being accused of, it’s all right for me. No matter is he is a gifted director of various classics or not, if he drugged and abused the girl, he has to face the consequences.

I think Huston’s objections are a pile of crap.

“She appeared to be one of those kind of little chicks between – could be any age up to 25. She did not look like a 13-year-old scared little thing.”

So what?! She was 13.


(Silence) #3

[quote=“Dillinger, post:2, topic:1984”]“She appeared to be one of those kind of little chicks between – could be any age up to 25. She did not look like a 13-year-old scared little thing.”

So what?! She was 13.[/quote]
And he still drugged her.


(autephex) #4

if you have not seen the mentioned documentary, i would really recommend

aside from what did or didn’t happen regarding this crime, the way the trial was handled was really very ridiculous and is an interesting story


(Frank Talby) #5

No one runs to France if they’re innocent. He knew he was going to jail or some harsh punishment. I have no respect or use for Polanski. He’s an arrogant ass to think the Swiss authorities will not bother to arrest him for entering the country. Send him back the States now.


(autephex) #6

Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired is the documentary, and it is fairly balanced… it doesn’t simply try to paint Polanski as a poor victim caught in an unfair trial…


(autephex) #7

…even the prosecuting attorney that was trying to put polanski in jail thought the trial he was facing was completley ridiculous, so i can’t say i blame him for running off to france


(autephex) #8

And for the record, I’m not trying to defend his actions in relation to him being guilty or not, but the whole thing really made a mockery of our “justice system”- one example among many


(Stanton) #9

Here is what the girl said a few years ago:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0302/24/lkl.00.html

If it’s true (but we will never know) Polanski deserves jail.


(autephex) #10

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i23c3f1198e87267c28ca61c87faeb0eb
another story…


(Bill san Antonio) #11

I’ve been wondering with this case since it all happened 25 years ago. Isn’t there some sort of time limit for most crimes when you won’t get punished anymore?


(autephex) #12

Apparantly not…

I think once you flee, you are then permanently a wanted fugitive… At least in the US, they don’t like it when you get away.

But even aside from that, I don’t think there is any time limit… you can be prosecuted for a crime commited at any point, I think. I could be wrong.


(Sundance) #13

It probably varies between countries, I think in Finland murder will never get old but other crimes do after 20 years or so. But if you have been given the sentence, even if you’ve never been captured, it will never get old. So basically if they figure out you robbed a bank 21 years ago, they can’t prosecute you anymore.

As for Polanski, from what I have understood about the court case, I would have escaped as well no matter if I was guilty or not, especially from the USA. :stuck_out_tongue:

http://www.zimbio.com/Samantha+Geimer/articles/11/Legacy+Justice+Forget+Roman+Chinatown
[I]“What the ignorant don’t know - and they would know all of this if they had watched the excellent, fascinating (and directed by a woman) documentary Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired (DVD release 1. 27.09) - is that the judge in the case, a notorious showboater, decided to renege on the deal and wanted to send Polanski to jail for up to 50 years, a sentence even the prosecutor and Polanski’s victim felt was too harsh. It was this aspect of the case - an out of control judge seeking media attention by meteing out an obviously unfair sentence - that drove Polanski to flee America, never again to return.”

“The truth is that the case of Roman Polanski is a complicated one. Yes, he was wrong for what he did. Yes, he deserved punishment. But he went through all the legal steps required of him, did everything ordered by the court, up until the point when the court decided to scrap the agreement.”[/i]


(autephex) #14

Yeah, I really do recommend the documentary

It really doesn’t try to paint a picture of Polanski as the good guy… its very conflicted and gives all the details from the victim’s side as well- and does all this upfront… but the court case was just outrageously handled


(Rififii) #15

The only films I am forbidden to see by my mom, are Polanski’s…because of the incident.


(I...I...Idiot) #16

Somehow my normal sly humor would seem out of place on this one.


(valenciano) #17

I think i read somewhere that rape does not age, so even though it happened a long time ago, he still can go to jail. I know too little to say anything more about it.


(Spaghetti Monkey) #18

I don’t think the statute of limitations applies to crimes of violence under any circumstances. But on the flip side, as autephex said, his case was handled quite ridiculously.


(Silence) #19

Why? It doesn’t make any difference for the films. The only one that has to do with it at all is Repulsion (not seen it tho).


(Dillinger) #20

Of course. But His mum doesn’t want to support persons like Polanski.
You don’t buy chocolate from Kim Yong-il, you don’t buy or rent a Polanski flick :wink: