Blasphemy!
Saw this one, searching for some posible redemption after whar Iāve read about it, but couldnāt find any, weak film.
The plot idea isnāt actually bad, but it seems that thereās so many things going on that you end up getting lost, the humour itās very forced, really low budget in all departments.
Other thing, well be true to history in low budget SW I know itās dificult, but by the end of the North American Civil war there were no Winchester rifles the first model itās from 1866 (I think) it was called the yellow boy and it a few more years to become popular, but in any case there were no such gun during or by the end of the war, so I guess they were using the same guns from film to film.
Technical note 2 Artistic note 2
One of the flicks I didnāt manage to finish. Canāt actually rememner why.
One to view with a few beers.
I would most probably end up cooking something to go with the beers ;D
The only good thing in this one itās the title very classy stuff
Sounds good to me .
Everything except dessert goes with beersā¦
This film is definitely one of the worst SW of all time.
Almost on a par with the Fidanis.
The Fidanis? Man, then I guess Iāll have to finish the flick.
Good luck.
Youāll need it if you want to see this movie.
donāt agree with the criticisms directed at this movie,i totally loved it, would really like to view this movie in its 2:35.1 aspect ratio as it was meanāt to be watched,still everyones entitled to their views.
and not only the trailer!!
i canāt find words for this crap!!! a trash at his best! :
[quote=āEl Topo, post:25, topic:240ā]I would most probably end up cooking something to go with the beers ;D
The only good thing in this one itās the title very classy stuff[/quote]
the title itās rip off from navajo joe
[quote=āThe Stranger, post:28, topic:240ā]This film is definitely one of the worst SW of all time.
Almost on a par with the Fidanis.[/quote]
there also some more crapiest as well
It was merely okay. -A bit hyper. And unevenly directed. I basically watched it for Ty Hardinās performance, which was pretty-good. The film definitely needs to be re-made. Or not. The bankrobbing-by-cannon idea is a great concept. But Iāll give this film just 2 stars.
I donāt know why this film has such a bad reputation. Ok, itās not that good film, average at best but itās definitely not one of the worst swās. I found it really entertaining with good cast and some great scenes and original ideas like the duel at the roulette table and bow vs cannon fight. One little detail I especially liked was Hardin eating berries during gunfight. Most of the comedic elements were awkward though.
My rating: 5/10
I gave it one star for now. Iāve watched it twice and itās never really blown me away. Thereās quite a few good scenes though. Maybe I should have given it another star.
A review has finally hit the database
What can I say, other than that the characters are off-kilter, the comedy silly and surreal? Well for instance that thereās some good spaghetti western violence as well ā¦
https://www.spaghetti-western.net/index.php/Acquasanta_Joe_Review
I like a lot this spaghie, but truth is it feels a bit disoriented and showdown Joe and Colonel vs. his henchmen could be better, but there are still some good things in the combat, for example use of tomahawk or when Joe suddenly takes down mounted guy.