The Last Movie You Watched?

Why a new thread for recently watched movies?

The different colors are also a bad idea.

ā€œDamn it, you Dutch suck!.. Always complaining, geez louise.ā€ >:(

Ok, here’s the reason for the new thread . I was too lazy to post the movies on their respectful thread and it made sense for me at that time. But if there’s a problem, have Seb delete it.

Merged here now.
And no anti Dutch ranting please. Their football team is making them suffer enough currently.

Ok, here’s the reason for the new thread . I was too lazy to post the movies on their respectful thread and it made sense for me at that time.
[/quote]

Yes, but where’s the difference to the ā€œlast movie you have watchedā€ thread?

Very true.

One consolation: we won’t be eliminated in a penalty shootout next summer

I watched Once Upon a Time in the West last night. I hadn’t forgotten its brilliance but it was even better than I remembered it. Most spaghetti westerns pale in comparison.

Ooops!.. so sorry. :slight_smile:

Well, not much really. My way of thinking was that to make it easier for me, i would put ā€œall genre recently seen moviesā€ on the same thread, that’s why i had them in color. As you can see, i watched 2 Italian Crime, 2 Euro spy action, 1 Giallo/Thriller and 1 American Western. But it’s ok, no worries amigos.

[size=10pt]Bone Tomahawk [2015][/size]

Well, it’s not exactly "The Searchesā€ and it’s not going to win any awards…however, this graphic cannibal western turned out to be better than I expected. Good turn out from Kurt Russell and Richard Jenkins in their roles, but man…this was a long film and it got off to a bit of a slow start. Regardless, the second half things really picked up and it went out with a bang. Overall a decent watch… and incredibly violent with one particular scene towards the end in a cave that you will soon not forget.

Ahh yes… exactly - that’s because OUTW isn’t really a spag as ā€œit trancends the genreā€. This is something that Stanton needs to understand… :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :slight_smile:

Yes but isn’t the genre defined (technically) by production origins (i.e. Italian involvement) than by what’s on-screen? Anyway you slice it, [I]it is[/I] a Spaghetti Western, no matter how unlike it is compared to many other examples within the genre.

I actually understand everything and everyone. Hope this doesn’t come as too big of a surprise …

Transcending the genre keeps the transcendender still inside the genre. Which makes this humble film the one and real Spagie (unless one prefers Tagliatelle from his favourite Italian)

@ Transcending the genre keeps the transcendender still inside the genre.

I’m not sure that is true, Stanton.

transcend
[tran-send]

verb (used with object)

to rise above or go beyond; overpass; exceed:
to transcend the limits of thought; kindness transcends courtesy.

to outdo or exceed in excellence, elevation, extent, degree, etc.; surpass; excel.

Theology. (of the Deity) to be above and independent of (the universe, time, etc.).

A genre film is a genre film is a genre film …

Yes, but if you say movie transcends the genre (rises above, goes beyond, etc.) it would be logical to conclude that it’s no longer part of it. Moreover the spaghetti western is technically not a genre, but a subgenre. So it’s imaginable that a move is still called a western (Once Upon is no doubt one) but no longer a spaghetti western.

Oddly enough I think the movie transcends the subgenre, but I still consider it a spaghetti western, so maybe there’s something wrong with the term, or my conception of it.

I just too drunk to any philosophical discussion, I do like women it’s my kind of favourite genre, among western spaghettis and war movies of course-

I watched Bone Tomahawk (Zahler, 2015) this evening, my dribblings on the matter HERE[url]http://letterboxd.com/lastcaress1972/film/bone-tomahawk/[/url].

My take on it is when a genre film transcends the genre, it means it ā€œbreaks outā€ or crosses over into the bigger budget films genre whatever that is. it still remains a part of its original genre however. After all, a film can be more than one genre cant it? as in a comedy-horror etc…

I don’t think that a film which transcends a genre, which is a highly subjective impression anyway, is then somewhere outside the genre, it simply brings the genre to a new level.

2001 is still a SF film, but it made things with the genre nobody had expected before. OUTW had a similar impact on the SW as well as on the western as a whole. But there is more in these films than being innovative to justify the term. Others would call these films highly pretentious, and there is only a small gap between these diametral assessments.

Other Spags for which the term could be used are Il mercenario and Se sei vivo spara.