The Last Movie You Watched?

[quote=“Farmer_J, post:11640, topic:1923”]The Wild Rovers - 1971
I picked up the Warner disc of this, which is in great condition a few weeks ago. Its a long western, just over 2 hours, and it does does suffer from a few scenes that could not be included, as they just added on to kill time. I later learnt that Blake Edwards wanted this film to be a three hour epic, but did not like the the finished film, also because they changed the ending to a more upbeat one. Aside from these few scenes, its a great little seen western. Ross (William Holden) and Frank (Ryan O’Neal) are two cattlemen who plan to rob a bank so Ross can retire to Mexico, so of course as in most western traditions, it goes balls up, and ends up with the two being hunted. Holde looks great as the old, haggard gunslinger, and O’Neal’s role is played more as the “dumb blonde” of western heroes, though he he does have some terrific lines. All in all, a lovely little western, with some nice direction by Edwards. 8/10[/quote]

A 7/10 in my opinion; good movie, but a flawed one. This is my take on it:

[size=12pt]Forces spéciales - 2011 - Stéphane Rybojad[/size]

[url]Photobucket | The safer way to store your photos

After watching Lone Surviver, wanted to take a chance to this similar film dealing with the same subject, this time a European one, French in the case.
Peculiarly Special Forces is a more Hollywood type of film than the US film ever was even if both of them have the same objective . It’s a more conventional film made by the book, without a great deal of innovation or differentiation. There’s even the good tribes vs bad Taliban tribes thing so common in this films, the bad guy was clearly an uninspired one, and for a bad guy he dies in a sudden.

It does have a bit more of story and of course it deals with more characters. A French journalist (the lovely Diane Kruger) is kidnapped by the Taliban while searching for na Afgan woman sold as a wife still as a child. A team of top French Special Forces is brought on to the rescue, they manage to free the journalist and her guide, but lost communications and extraction is no longer possible as planned, and with that they have to go back to Afghanistan by foot in the most difficult terrain with the Taliban in their tail… yes plenty imagination.
If you like war movies not a bad choice if you’re not too picky. It starts with the right amount of humanization as we get to know the different elements of the team in civil life, and then the action takes places, things do happen very fast and never get boring. The beginning is clearly marketing for the French Army, but in my view any propaganda intents for recruiting new men for the French Army, gets a serious blow with the amount of suffering going on during the film, suffering and also sacrifice.
I normally watch this type of films with a clinical or “professional” eye, I never had the amount of training that this top dog active special forces do have, but I do know a few things, and its really strange to me that with all the hard work production teams have to make things look as real as possible to the viewer, with the right gear, weapon systems etc, and then they spoil everything with basic stuff.
I won’t reveal much but no Special Forces will attack a superior force standing up in front of the enemy, like if they were in the OK Curral, anyone who did basic training knows that, and if losing com’s is normal, there’s still plenty of ways to be localize in a combat zone, even more in special mission.
Worst of all is the way they enter in Pakistan, in a clandestine operation when you have to parachute in enemy territory (or not enemy like it was the case), you do it during the night, and the way they made it looked more like some radical sport guys jumping in South France…c’est la vie.
In the end nothing special here, a small homage to Platoon with one the characters named Elias (and eating the dust in a similar way), but like I said a very normal film.
Saying this you just watch it like thousands of normal films out there, it’s easy to follow, a clear no brainer, to be honest I was expecting something more different once again…ces’t la vie.

[size=12pt]The Way Back - 2010 - Peter Weir[/size]

[url]Photobucket | The safer way to store your photos

Well I know I’m wrong, but is not all about football these days, I’m still able to watch something between the mandatory 90 plus 90 minutes of the World Cup Games.
In my watch pile for a while been quite curious to take a look at this work from renowned Aussie director Peter Weir, the story was also quite interesting, so I confess I anxious to take a look at The Way Back.
The film tells the story of a group of prisoners from a Soviet Gulag placed in Siberia that lead by an ex Polish officer manage to escape and walk 6000 km back to India.
The group is very diverse all foreigners or not Russian at least, with one exception a brutal Russian thug that wasn’t a political prisoner (a brilliant Collin Farell), a Lithuanian, a Polish priest, an American engineer trapped in a Gulag because of the great depression, and others mostly Polish, all lead by the Polish officer (played by a very British Jim Sturgess), there’s also a female character (an elegiac Saoirse Ronan) that appears and joins the group after the Gulag escape, giving the group a unique dimension almost like a family. Really like the acting from both big and less big names, Ed Harris is great and Mark Strong very effective in a small but important role Farell is also quite good, don’t about the accents, but it sounded good to me.
It’s a “On the road movie”, but what a road, Siberia the Gobi Desert, and the Himalayas. Some scenes are pretty amazing like the one with the wolfs when they dispute the carcass, and the one where they reach the Soviet border with Mongolia and Valka the Russian thug that escaped the gulag because of debts to the kingpin of the place, and that has a tattoo with Stalin, he’s just not able to cross the border, there are other prisons where no one knows me – he says, very Russian.
It’s a long film more than two hours which is understandable, it’s a lot of ground to cover, still I didn’t find it boring, liked the dialogue and some unique characteristics like the loyalty among the group, and how the female character is treated (like a daughter not a woman).
It also works in favor of the film, the lack of an epic feeling David Lean style, the colors are dark, and the brilliant photography is not a spectacular one but grim and grey, and works perfectly, clearly intentional in my view.
It’s understandable why such a film went off the radar when it was released, some big names a well-known director, but not an obvious story for the masses and not much action.
It’s not a perfect film but I like it, liked the style and the way it was directed, how subtle it was with the character’s avoiding basic characterization and most common places, and with two hours long never gets boring by the contrary.
It also can e considered as anti-communist propaganda, but if you’re dealing with Gulag prisoners and Stalinism, you have to be honest and true to history.
The story is based in a book by the Polish officer named Slavomir Rawicz, so a true story a real account of the events. The book also mentions the spotting of a pair of yeti-like creatures in the Himalayas.
Over the years the events of Rawicz book were put in cause by third parts (mostly other Gulag Polish prisioners), and it he seems he didn’t took part in the real events, he was freed from the Gulag in 1942 in an amnesty, but instead it seems the story is based not in authors experience but the in the account the author heard of three men caught by a Gurka patrol in India, telling the British officer who interrogated him they escaped from a Prisoner Camp in Siberia.
True or not, I do recommend the film, somewhere among National Geographic and an adventures film, and directed with taste.

[size=12pt]UNITED[/size] (2011, James Strong)

British television film (released theatrically in various countries) chronicling the events that lead up to (and follow) the Munich air disaster in which some of England’s finest young soccer players - the so-called Busby babes - died in an air crash. Manchester United had played a game in Belgrade (and qualified for the semi-finals of the European Cup) and the plane crashed when failing to take off after refueling on Munich airport. The film mainly focuses on assistant manager Jimmy Murphy (who didn’t make the trip to Belgrade because he had obligations elsewhere as Wales’ national coach) and the two most talented young players, Duncan Edwards (one of the victims) and Bobby Charlton (who survived).

The film is not without flaws - there are a few needlessly corny moments and the portrayal of Matt Busby as a gangster boss rather than a football boss seems completely out of place - but it’s often emotionally wrenching and some of the acting is outstanding. Jack O’Connol is remarkably convincing as the young Bobby Charlton, who had always been a smiling boy (so we’re told by his mum) but became (and would remain for the rest of his life) a silent and introspective person (“Not a day passes without you thinking of it,” I heard him say in an interview) and that excellent actor David Tennant is near-brilliant as Jimmy Murphy.

If you watch one MOVIE about football these days, be sure it’s this one. It makes you realize the relativity of all things.

Hornet’s Nest - WWII adventure where Hudson with the help of some wanna be partisan kids blows up a damn, quite enjoyed this, great Morricone score and the transfer looks really good. Don’t be put of thinking it’s gonna be a familyfied sort of film, it’s pretty violent in places.

Oldboy - I was impressed, obviously not a patch on the Korean original but Spike Lee has made a good film here. If it wasn’t a remake I reckon it would have garnered a fair bit of praise.

The Delta Force - Chuck Norris Vs Muslim Terrorists, great piece of 80’s Cannon action, I always laugh when he kicks Robert Forster up. One of my favourite Chuck’s this one.

Last Year at Marienbad (1961) - 7/10

Sisters (1973) - 7/10

Obsession (1976) - 8/10

Antichrist (2009) - 4/10

The Hill (1965) - 8/10

Phantom of the Paradise (1974) - 9/10

Jacob’s Ladder (1990) - 8/10

L’amico di famiglia (2006) - 6/10

Olympus Has Fallen - North Korean Terrorists lay siege on the White House and hold the President and several aides hostage, it’s up to Gerard Butler to save the day. Really enjoyed this, a whole lot better than I was expecting it to be.

About the silliest action piece I’ve seen in a while
Butler isn’t bad at playing Bruce Willis, though …

The score in The Delta Force is what I always remember. A product of the time, but I like it.

Whenever I read or hear a Chuck Norris joke, the Chuck I think of is the one in Delta Force and Invasion U.S.A.

[quote=“Filmlovr1, post:11650, topic:1923”]Whenever I read or hear a Chuck Norris joke, the Chuck I think of is the one in Delta Force and Invasion U.S.A.[/quote]Funny enough they are probably my favourite two.

Especially for you, Ennioo :slight_smile:

I watched Invasion USA many, many years ago…but I still remember my favorite line - where Chuck Norris calmly says “Your’e beginning to irritate me” It was pretty predictable what was to follow right after he said that ;D

Black Sabbath
-Beautiful looking and at times pretty scary episode horror from Mario Bava with Boris Karloff.

“I’m gonna hit you with so many rights you’re gonna beg for a left” :smiley:

Last movie I watched was Day of the Wolves (1973). Initial impression during the first 5 minutes was that I’m not going to be able to sit through this. It had that crappy, low-budget 70’s ambience…which Tarantino and Rodriguez artifically added to their Grindhouse series of films. Anyway, it was kind of interesting and has an abrupt, humorous and unanticipated ending…almost like they ran out of money and cut the film short. Worthwhile to watch and somewhat reminds the viewer of Reservoir Dogs.

[quote=“Yodlaf Peterson, post:11652, topic:1923”]Especially for you, Ennioo :slight_smile:

[url]The Delta Force - Alan Silvestri - YouTube

Cheers, very nice !

Today: Had a go at Snowpiercer (Bong, 2013), aka Elysium on a Train. It was okay but it didn’t enthral me in the way that Bong Joon-ho’s earlier film The Host (2006) did. I’m bored of films about the “haves” versus the “have nots”. I mean I’m very much a “have not” but these films are often very heavy handed, very on-the-nose. Also, the nature of almost everything in this movie taking place within the confines of a train inevitably left everything moving exclusively left-to-right, or right-to-left, or foreground-to-background. Limiting, and I’m afraid a little dull, despite Mr. Bong’s best efforts at keeping things tense and exciting (and in fairness to him, he does as much as I think anyone could). Good performances all round, but largely by actors with whom I’ve never felt any real connection: Chris Evans, Jamie Bell, Ed Harris. I love Tilda Swinton generally, but not here. It’s not that she doesn’t do well, but the character is awful, and played somewhat for laughs, which jars against the rest of the film. The saving grace here is the always brilliant Song Kang-ho. I’d happily watch it all again just to watch him.

300:Rise of an Empire-Noam Murro
Not that good for me this one!..It’s a Big step down from the first 300. Action scenes aplenty, buckets of blood aplenty, battle ships aplenty and even Eva Green’s boobs are not enough to save this turkey. 4/10

3 Days To Kill-McG, with Kevin Costner
No clue what the hell this was supposed to be…I like Costner, but this sucked major Ass. It started great with the action, but then it turned into part romance, part father-daughter redemption drama/comedy and it kept jumping back and forth and so on. 5/10

[quote=“Lone Gringo, post:11659, topic:1923”]300:Rise of an Empire-Noam Murro
Not that good for me this one!..It’s a Big step down from the first 300. Action scenes aplenty, buckets of blood aplenty, battle ships aplenty and even Eva Green’s boobs are not enough to save this turkey. 4/10[/quote]

Agree entirely with that. I LOVE 300; found 300:RoaE severely lacking. All the action you’d expect, but with none of the interest. Shame.