I have made some changes to my Winnetou the Warrior Review, but canât load the new version up due to a spam filter
Apparently this page is under protection:
http://www.spaghetti-western.net/index.php/Winnetou_the_Warrior_Review
I have made some changes to my Winnetou the Warrior Review, but canât load the new version up due to a spam filter
Apparently this page is under protection:
http://www.spaghetti-western.net/index.php/Winnetou_the_Warrior_Review
Again I had trouble to load up a new version of a review, in this case :
http://www.spaghetti-western.net/index.php/Rampage_at_Apache_Wells_/_Der_Ălprinz_Review
The problem, again, was the letter combination âcialisâ
I made a remark, in the text, about the popularity of the May novels among National-Socialists, and had to âmaskâ this word (National-Sociali*ts) in order to be able to load up the text
Can this be changed? Like this, itâll be impossible to say something about a film like The Specialists in the database
I havenât had time yet, but I will look into it and fix it
Do you all get a [size=14pt]Database Error[/size] message too?
I get this:
A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was:
(SQL query hidden)
from within function âSqlBagOStuff::getâ. Database returned error â145: Table â./SWD1/swdb_objectcacheâ is marked as crashed and should be repaired (localhost)â.
[quote=âscherpschutter, post:84, topic:81â]Do you all get a [size=14pt]Database Error[/size] message too?
I get this:
A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was:
(SQL query hidden)
from within function âSqlBagOStuff::getâ. Database returned error â145: Table â./SWD1/swdb_objectcacheâ is marked as crashed and should be repaired (localhost)â.[/quote]
Yes.
Me too.
Yeah, me too. Wondering whatâs going on.
Yep, I just saw it.
Yes, me as well. It doesnât look or sound good :-\ ???.
Count me in, I almost had to transform myself in Bill Gates to get in the forum
It works again! ;D ;D ;D
Is this a joke or were there really 321 people logged in yesterday ?
Would never have noticed that if you would not have pointed out. Well that is a fair number .
Of the 1111 members!
guys, as announced on the internal facebook swdb group, in emergencies like these please immediately send me an email. there are days where i dont check out the swdb at all and unless someone informs me of an urgent technical problem, I cannot react to itâŚ
Was that an emergency ??
I only noticed this number yesterday, when there were some 25 people on-line, like normally is the case. I canât imagine 321 people were on-line.
I believe he may mean the earlier database error?
yes the database error, which I was told afterwards that it had occured the entire day already before I even noticed myselfâŚ
I just saw this as well; I too think something went wrong, because we definatly donât have that many active members.
I donât trust numbers