[quote=“scherpschutter, post:260, topic:405”]Scars of Dracula (1970)
Not counting Taste the Blood of Dracula of the same year (in which Dracula only made a brief ‘guest appearance’) this one follows (the rather dissapointing) Dracula has risen from the Grave.
Always been one of my favourite Hammers, with great atmosphere and fine thrills. Probably the last to take the Dracula myth seriously enough to be scary, before the series deteriorated into parody and silly efforts to breathe new life in it by transporting Dracula to the 20th century, which doesn’t make sense. Dracula, as the creature who defies death, and therefore becomes the evil force who rivals the resurrected Christ, can only succesfully function in a time and place in which the christian faith was still vivid. There are some hints at parody here, but most of them are outings of the typical sixties attitude to ridicule dignitaries (der burgemeister for instance)
For Dracula purists there may be two problems: the count uses a knife (instead of his fangs) to kill one of the girls, and in rivalling contemporary horror movies, this late entry has become so gory and violent that some of the old charm has gone. This is no longer suitable for family entertainment
The angelic girl who has to be saved at all cost (the other girls are all sluts, hardly worth defending) is not just angelic, she is an angel. I just read on the net that she made herself a name in a children’s programme called Magpie. Right, Jenny Hanley, an angel:
[url]http://img121.imageshack.us/i/dinahsdaughterjennyhanl.jpg/[/url][/quote]
Aaahh, Jenny Hanley :-*
Flashback to impressionable, romantic minded boy watching kids TV
I mentioned the lovely Jenny a few days ago the “What film are you watching tonight” thread as she appeared in Pete Walker’s The Flesh and Blood Show. She really was an angel and, according to Walker in an interview on the subject, a delightful person to work with too. I’d forgotten she was in Scars for Dracula. This one will need to be viewed again very soon.



