[quote=“SARTANA DJANGO, post:28, topic:358”]It would be a new dimension if you ever RESPECTED and REVIEWED SWs Correctly
instead of complaining that you have seen too many SWs and many are “mediocre”.
What is that ??? Each SW needs to be fully respected, discussed and reviewed :’([/quote]
Oh, I respect , but only if imo respect is deserved, but I also differentiate.
“Reviewed correctly” (means SDs view) is typical McCloudish.
NICHT ACHTUNG !! The ZERO TALENT Mediocre, wooden Directors are those I correctly
KEPT OUT of the BEST DIRECTORS Poll after you spent hours trying to doctor the poll :-\
Ha, ha, but nearly all are in.
MORE LIKELY from Stanton's WILLOW WOODEN LIST that include Subtitled Drama Art
House nonsense, ultra recent DATED non films, weird foreign drama & then he tells us :
“so many mediocre SWs with mediocre Directors” as if seeing SWs is a SUFFERING ???
I think this being a SW FORUM the sensible, balanced , rational OPINION is that the
DULL DATED Dramas/Subtitled/NON “art” obscure Film is MEDIOCRE 100% ??? NOT SWs
My Comments on Certain Peckinpah Films Like Wild Bunch, Pat Garrett, Garcia are fair,
accurate and factual. I still like Wild Bunch 69 but it has shortcomings as I explained.
Mediocre and bad films are boring and sometimes watching bad films is a form of suffering.
Denying that many Spags are only mediocre or even bad is like …, well, perhaps the earth is flat.
Straw Dogs 1971 was well made/directed.
Shit, you know how to hurt me