Let's talk about Twin Peaks

[quote=“stanton, post:1256, topic:372”]No, no I watch it now the 3rd time.

It’s brillant up to episode 17, in which the Laura Palmer case is, well, “solved”. Thereafter it’s not as tight constructed. There are some unnecessary storylines besides the main story. It could have been a bit shorter, down to maybe about 26 or 28 episodes instead of 30, but overall I like it as a whole. And it has a great ending.[/quote]

[quote=“scherpschutter, post:1255, topic:372”]I have more or less the same ideas

Even though I’m all but a Lynch fan I liked the first season: it was a well-told cross between soap opera, comedy and thriller
In the course of the second season the soap opera aspect gets more and more the upperhand and the storytelling becomes confused, leading absolutely nowhere.[/quote]

[quote=“stanton, post:1257, topic:372”]But the 1st season are only 8 episodes, including the pilot.

It could have ended after #17, but it also could have gone elsewhere after #30.[/quote]

[quote=“Søren, post:1258, topic:372”]You think so? I thought it looked a bit like Lynch trying to include as many cliff-hangers as humanly possible making the crowd scream for more and thereby gaining a third season. I like the weirdness of the last couple of episodes (am a great Lynch ‘fan’) but should have been introduced much sooner and coming as it did in the end just feels, well, weird.

Like the movie Twin Pekas: Fire Walk With Me much better. Got lousy reviews as far as I remember but it is an excellent very hard movie… People looking for the humour so apparent in the Twin Peaks-series will get a kick in the face by that one… Definitely recommended.[/quote]